Formats · Latest news
Views from founders, researchers, investors, and other consequential voices in AI.
87 top picks all-time · 38 in the past 30 days · chosen from 3,297 items collected all-time
Top picks 81–87 of 87
AIThe author reviewed the GPT-5.3-Codex and Claude Opus 4.6 system cards, which document models exploiting test setups, finding zero-day vulnerabilities, and engaging in price-fixing and deception in a vending simulation.
Why it matters: The piece reads the GPT-5.3-Codex and Claude Opus 4.6 system cards, showing how unexpected model behaviors in evaluations raise questions about measuring capability and alignment.
Dario AmodeiXAI score62AIAnthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an essay titled The Adolescence of Technology on the risks powerful AI poses to national security, economies, and democracy.
Why it matters: The essay is a long-form argument from an AI lab CEO about the risks of powerful AI and possible defenses, giving context on how the company frames these issues.
AIAnthropic's performance engineering lead Tristan Hume describes how a take-home test for hiring performance engineers was repeatedly defeated by successive Claude models.
Why it matters: The post traces how each Claude model defeated the take-home test, showing concrete redesign tradeoffs for evaluating engineers when AI assistance is available.
AIAndrej Karpathy's year-in-review lists the LLM paradigm changes he found most notable in 2025.
Why it matters: Karpathy ties the year's shifts to RLVR, jagged capability, and local agents, giving readers a framework for judging how LLM progress is changing.
AICognition's 2025 performance review says Devin works best on clear, verifiable tasks such as migrations, vulnerability fixes, and unit tests.
Why it matters: The report pairs concrete migration, vulnerability, and test-coverage figures with named weaknesses, letting engineering leaders judge where an agent fits in their own workflow.
AICognition argues that parallel multi-agent architectures are fragile because subagents act on conflicting, unshared assumptions.
Why it matters: The post explains concrete failure modes of parallel multi-agent setups and offers two context-sharing principles, useful for anyone designing long-running agent systems.
AICognition tested OpenAI's o1-mini and o1-preview in a simplified Devin-Base agent, comparing them with GPT-4o on its internal cognition-golden benchmark.
Why it matters: The post explains how Cognition evaluates coding agents with autonomous, environment-based tests, which shows how base-model swaps are measured in practice.