LangChain publishes guide to evaluating AI agents with datasets, judges and benchmarks
Overview
LangChain's Divya Santhanam publishes a Q&A guide on evaluating AI agents, according to a report on X by meng shao.
The guide recommends starting from real agent traces, building 10 to 20 example datasets, and running baseline experiments. It prefers code-based evaluators over LLM judges.
The guide says a smaller judge model matched human labels on pass/fail checks at about $0.34 per run, compared with $28.17 for Claude Sonnet 4.6.
Written by AI from the articles below · updated Oct 15, 12:29 AM ET
Check the sources:
Article timeline
The articles in this story. Times are ET.
meng shao@shao__mengXLangChain shares a practical guide to agent evals, covering datasets, judges and benchmarksAIIn a Q&A guide, LangChain's Divya Santhanam describes a workflow for evaluating agents, starting from real traces, building 10 to 20 example datasets, and running baseline experiments. The guide prioritizes code-based evaluators over LLM judges, and it says a smaller judge model matched human labels on pass/fail checks at about $0.34 versus $28.17 for Claude Sonnet 4.6.

Heat trend
Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.