Skip to content
Trending storyDeveloping

LangChain publishes guide to evaluating AI agents with datasets, judges and benchmarks

1 article1 sourcesince Oct 15Last article 1h ago ·

Overview

AISummary of 1 article

LangChain's Divya Santhanam publishes a Q&A guide on evaluating AI agents, according to a report on X by meng shao.

The guide recommends starting from real agent traces, building 10 to 20 example datasets, and running baseline experiments. It prefers code-based evaluators over LLM judges.

The guide says a smaller judge model matched human labels on pass/fail checks at about $0.34 per run, compared with $28.17 for Claude Sonnet 4.6.

Written by AI from the articles below · updated Oct 15, 12:29 AM ET

Check the sources:

Article timeline

The articles in this story. Times are ET.

Oct 15
  1. meng shaoX
    LangChain shares a practical guide to agent evals, covering datasets, judges and benchmarks

    AIIn a Q&A guide, LangChain's Divya Santhanam describes a workflow for evaluating agents, starting from real traces, building 10 to 20 example datasets, and running baseline experiments. The guide prioritizes code-based evaluators over LLM judges, and it says a smaller judge model matched human labels on pass/fail checks at about $0.34 versus $28.17 for Claude Sonnet 4.6.

    Image from @shao__meng's post

Heat trend

Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.