Skip to content
Trending storyDeveloping

Thoroughness vs. over-editing in automated code review

1 article1 sourcesince Oct 27Last article

Overview

AISummary of 1 article

@nrehiew_ says the line between thorough bug fixing in unprompted code paths and over-editing beyond a prompt's request is very fine, and that automated code review design has therefore become subjective.

The post refers to Cognition's FrontierCode 2.0 benchmark, where the top model scores 45%. The report is a single social media post, and it does not describe any specific review tool, rule or test result beyond that benchmark score.

Written by AI from the articles below · updated Oct 27, 6:23 PM ET

Check the sources:

Latest developmentOct 27, 5:59 PM ET
Thoroughness versus over-editing makes automated code review subjective

Article timeline

The articles in this story. Times are ET.

Oct 27
  1. whX
    Thoroughness versus over-editing makes automated code review subjective

    AI@nrehiew_ says the line between thorough bug fixing in unprompted code paths and over-editing beyond a prompt's request is very fine. He suggests automated code review design has entered a subjective phase. The post reflects on Cognition's FrontierCode 2.0 benchmark, where the top model scores 45%.

    Image from @nrehiew_'s post

Heat Trend

Current comparable heat
7
Peak comparable heat
10Oct 27, 7:00 PM ET
Change in past 24 hours
–

The trend compares only continuously observed participants, so its scope may be smaller than the current heat total. Hover or tap for hourly heat; use arrow keys with a keyboard.