Artificial Analysis launches Decision Index ranking decision models by capability, cost, speed
Overview
Artificial Analysis introduces the Decision Index v1.0, a benchmark that compares decision models on classification, tool calling, knowledge and reasoning, and publishes its methodology and results.
The firm says the index measures capability, cost and speed, and also compares decision models with language models.
In the results, Jev 1.13 from typesafeai scores 58, ahead of GLiDE from Fastino and Microsoft-Decision-1 from Microsoft, which each score 54. Celeris-1 Decision is the fastest at 0.06 seconds per task. Artificial Analysis says Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low), a language model, scores higher at 61, but costs $184 per 1M tasks against $42 for Jev 1.13 and takes 11 times longer per task.
Written by AI from the articles below · updated Oct 13, 12:51 PM ET
Check the sources:
Article timeline
The articles in this story. Times are ET.
Artificial Analysis@ArtificialAnlysOfficialArtificial Analysis publishes methodology and results for its Decision IndexAIArtificial Analysis links to a full methodology page and results page for its new Decision Index evaluation. The post gives no scores, models, or metrics beyond these links.
Artificial Analysis@ArtificialAnlysOfficialArtificial Analysis launches Decision Index; Jev 1.13 leads decision modelsAIArtificial Analysis introduces the Decision Index v1.0, benchmarking decision models on classification, tool calling, knowledge and reasoning. Jev 1.13 from typesafeai scores 58, ahead of GLiDE (54) and Microsoft-Decision-1 (54), while Celeris-1 Decision is fastest at 0.06 seconds per task. Language models such as Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) score higher, at 61, but cost $184 per 1M tasks versus $42 for Jev 1.13 and take 11x longer per task.

Heat trend
Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.