Researchers propose reward design to keep AI agents in check without inspecting them
Overview
Stephen Morris, Elad Hazan and colleagues propose mechanism design, which sets rewards so AI agents behave as intended without requiring researchers to understand their internal workings, according to MIT Technology Review.
Morris's preprint suggests rewarding a model for how well its answers predict a second model's output, so that sandbagging on tests becomes a losing bet. Hazan proposes agents that alternate as solvers and auditors, with cheating solvers punished and auditors punished for failing to catch them. Hazan's approach still faces the risk that agents collude.
Written by AI from the articles below · updated Nov 3, 6:20 AM ET
Check the sources:
Article timeline
The articles in this story. Times are ET.
- MIT Technology Review · AINewsHow "reverse game theory" could keep AI agents in check
AIResearchers Stephen Morris, Elad Hazan and colleagues propose mechanism design, which sets rewards so that AI agents behave as intended without relying on understanding their internal workings. Morris's preprint suggests rewarding a model for how well its answers predict a second model's output, so that sandbagging on tests becomes a losing bet. Hazan proposes agents that take turns as solvers and auditors, punishing cheating solvers and auditors that fail to catch them, though collusion between agents remains a risk.
Heat Trend
Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.