Ethan Mollick urges academics to test AI feedback on their own papers

Ethan Mollick says AI is contested as a tool for reviewing academic work, but can be insightful when used properly.

In a post on X dated 3 November 2026, he suggests that readers ask GPT-6 Pro or Opus 5.5 High for substantive feedback on one of their own papers to test this. The post is Mollick's own view; the report includes no data on how the feedback was rated or how accurate it was.