Skip to content
Trending storyDeveloping

vLLM reports GB200 forward-pass gains from Inferact kernels in microbenchmarks

2 articles1 sourcesince Oct 16Last article 56m ago ·

Overview

AISummary of 2 articles

vLLM says Inferact's fused all-reduce plus norm, packed QKV and tanh softcap kernels cut GB200 forward time from 4.23 to 3.89 ms at TP4 batch 1, and from 8.15 to 6.47 ms at TP8 batch 128.

The figures come from forward microbenchmarks run with dummy weights, not from end-to-end serving tests, so they do not show serving throughput or latency.

A second vLLM post repeats the same figures and the same caveat.

Written by AI from the articles below · updated Oct 16, 11:44 AM ET

Check the sources:

Article timeline

The articles in this story. Times are ET.

Oct 16
  1. vLLMOfficial
    Inferact's kernel work cuts GB200 forward times in microbenchmarks

    AIInferact's fused all-reduce plus norm, packed QKV, and tanh softcap kernels cut GB200 forward microbenchmark times, per vLLM. TP4 batch 1 fell from 4.23 ms to 3.89 ms, and TP8 batch 128 from 8.15 ms to 6.47 ms. The benchmarks used dummy weights and measured forward passes, not end-to-end serving.

    Image from @vllm_project's post
  2. vLLMOfficial
    vLLM shares GB200 forward microbenchmark gains from Inferact's kernel work

    AIvLLM says Inferact's fused all-reduce plus norm, packed QKV paths, and tanh softcap kernel cut GB200 forward time from 4.23 to 3.89 ms at TP4 batch 1, and from 8.15 to 6.47 ms at TP8 batch 128. The figures come from forward microbenchmarks with dummy weights, not end-to-end serving results.

    Image from @vllm_project's post

Heat trend

Current comparable heat
10
Peak comparable heat
10Oct 16, 10:00 AM ET
Change in past 24 hours
–

The trend compares only continuously observed participants, so its scope may be smaller than the current heat total. Hover or tap for hourly heat; use arrow keys with a keyboard.