LangChain's OpenWiki and evidence graph raise agent accuracy on cross-document questions
Overview
LangChain says its open-source wiki compiler, OpenWiki, raised agent accuracy on connected questions from 0.10 with keyword search to 0.52 in a test on a 111-document synthetic insurance library, and cut cost per correct answer from about $0.55 to $0.19.
Citation overlap across repeated runs fell to 0.25 on those questions, which LangChain says an evidence graph layered on the wiki was meant to address.
In a later X post, LangChain says adding its lightweight evidence graph to OpenWiki gives 5x higher accuracy than grep alone, 27% more accuracy than the wiki without the graph, and 2x citation consistency on complex, cross-source questions. It also reports 58% lower cost per correct answer with the graph. These figures come from LangChain's own testing and have not been independently verified.
Written by AI from the articles below · updated Oct 28, 2:30 PM ET
Check the sources:
Article timeline
The articles in this story. Times are ET.
LangChain@LangChainOfficialLangChain pairs OpenWiki with an evidence graph for traceable agent memoryAILangChain says pairing its OpenWiki knowledge base with a lightweight evidence graph lets agents follow relationships and trace answers to supporting evidence. On complex, cross-source questions, the company reports 5x higher accuracy than grep alone, 27% more accuracy with the graph, and 2x citation consistency. It also reports 58% lower cost per correct answer with the graph.
- LangChain BlogOfficialLangChain's OpenWiki and evidence graph raise agent accuracy on cross-document questions
AILangChain tested OpenWiki, its open-source wiki compiler, as a memory layer for agents on a 111-document synthetic insurance library. On connected questions, the wiki raised accuracy from 0.10 with keyword search to 0.52 and cut cost per correct answer from about $0.55 to $0.19. Citation overlap across runs fell to 0.25 on those questions, which LangChain says a further evidence graph was meant to address.
Heat Trend
Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.