Skip to content
Trending storyDeveloping

Zyphra tests 28 sparse-attention router geometries; deeper trees retrieve better

2 articles1 sourcesince Nov 2Last article 2h ago ·

Overview

AISummary of 2 articles

Zyphra tested 28 router geometries for sparse attention and reports that, at fixed compression, deeper trees often retrieve better at the same sparsity.

Its 6-level router scores 93.3% on RULER-13 at 256K context, against 96.0% for dense attention, while attending to 2.8% of decode keys.

In a separate post, Zyphra describes top-p tree routing, in which each query starts at the top of the tree and follows promising branches down to the original keys during generation. Zyphra says top-p adapts to query complexity, exploring few branches for precise lookups and more for complex queries, whereas top-K routing must discard evidence as context grows.

Written by AI from the articles below · updated Nov 2, 5:23 PM ET

Check the sources:

Developments

2 developments

  1. Nov 2, 5:04 PM ET · 1 article
    Zyphra tests 28 router geometries, finds deeper trees retrieve better at fixed sparsity
    Zyphra: Zyphra's 6-level router reaches 93.3% on RULER-13 at 256K
  2. Nov 2, 5:04 PM ET · 1 article
    Zyphra describes top-p tree routing for query retrieval
    Zyphra: Zyphra describes top-p tree routing for query retrieval

Article timeline

The articles in this story. Times are ET.

Nov 2
  1. ZyphraOfficial
    Zyphra's 6-level router reaches 93.3% on RULER-13 at 256K

    AIZyphra reports that deeper tree routers can retrieve better than shallow ones at the same compression across 28 tested geometries. Its 6-level router scores 93.3% on RULER-13 at 256K context, versus 96.0% for dense attention, while attending to just 2.8% of decode keys.

    Image from @ZyphraAI's post
  2. ZyphraOfficial
    Zyphra describes top-p tree routing for query retrieval

    AIZyphra says each query starts at the top of the tree and recursively follows promising branches down to the original keys during generation. It adds that top-p routing adapts to query complexity, exploring few branches for precise lookups and more for complex queries, whereas top-K routing must discard evidence as context grows.

    Video from @ZyphraAI's post

Heat Trend

Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.