Salesforce paper compares distillation and RL training compute, finds 42% savings from expert merging
Overview
A Salesforce paper compares on-policy distillation with GRPO, a reinforcement learning method, by held-out accuracy per training FLOP. According to a summary by Rohan Paul on X, with an external post-trained teacher, GRPO generally won, and distillation often inflated response length.
The paper also reports that distilling per-domain GRPO experts into one student matched joint GRPO on math plus code with 42.0% fewer total FLOPs. Another summary of the paper says distilling from a large external teacher usually costs more compute than plain RL.
Written by AI from the articles below · updated Nov 7, 7:21 PM ET
Check the sources:
Article timeline
The articles in this story. Times are ET.
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_aiXSalesforce paper finds RL-trained domain experts cut distillation compute by 42%AIA Salesforce paper compares on-policy distillation with GRPO by held-out accuracy per training FLOP. With an external post-trained teacher, GRPO generally won and distillation often inflated response length. Distilling per-domain GRPO experts into one student matched joint GRPO on math plus code with 42.0% fewer total FLOPs.

Heat Trend
Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.