Joel Niklaus releases Harness Leaderboard comparing nine coding-agent harnesses
Overview
Joel Niklaus releases the Harness Leaderboard, which compares nine coding-agent harnesses running open models across 28,849 trials and $4,746 of inference, according to a post by Teknium on X.
Averaged over three models, mini-swe-agent solves 51.4% of tasks and Pi solves 49.4%. Pi costs $0.29 per solved task, about 45% less than mini-swe-agent's $0.53. The post says the best harness depends on the model, and opencode costs $3.35 per solved task, 11.7 times Pi's cost.
Written by AI from the articles below · updated Nov 6, 2:46 AM ET
Check the sources:
Article timeline
The articles in this story. Times are ET.
Teknium 🪽@TekniumXJoel Niklaus releases Harness Leaderboard comparing nine coding-agent harnessesAIJoel Niklaus releases the Harness Leaderboard, comparing nine coding-agent harnesses on open models across 28,849 trials and $4,746 of inference. Averaged over three models, mini-swe-agent solves 51.4% of tasks, while Pi solves 49.4% at $0.29 per solved task, about 45% less than mini-swe-agent's $0.53. The best harness depends on the model, and opencode costs $3.35 per solved task, 11.7 times Pi's cost.

Heat Trend
Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.