Skip to content
Trending storyDeveloping

Joel Niklaus releases Harness Leaderboard comparing nine coding-agent harnesses

1 article1 sourcesince Nov 6Last article 2h ago ·

Overview

AISummary of 1 article

Joel Niklaus releases the Harness Leaderboard, which compares nine coding-agent harnesses running open models across 28,849 trials and $4,746 of inference, according to a post by Teknium on X.

Averaged over three models, mini-swe-agent solves 51.4% of tasks and Pi solves 49.4%. Pi costs $0.29 per solved task, about 45% less than mini-swe-agent's $0.53. The post says the best harness depends on the model, and opencode costs $3.35 per solved task, 11.7 times Pi's cost.

Written by AI from the articles below · updated Nov 6, 2:46 AM ET

Check the sources:

Article timeline

The articles in this story. Times are ET.

Nov 6
  1. Teknium 🪽X
    Joel Niklaus releases Harness Leaderboard comparing nine coding-agent harnesses

    AIJoel Niklaus releases the Harness Leaderboard, comparing nine coding-agent harnesses on open models across 28,849 trials and $4,746 of inference. Averaged over three models, mini-swe-agent solves 51.4% of tasks, while Pi solves 49.4% at $0.29 per solved task, about 45% less than mini-swe-agent's $0.53. The best harness depends on the model, and opencode costs $3.35 per solved task, 11.7 times Pi's cost.

    Image from @Teknium's post

Heat Trend

Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.