Skip to content
Trending storyDeveloping

Artificial Analysis ranks Keenable Search 1.0 first on its search index

3 articles1 sourcesince Nov 10Last article 37m ago ·

Overview

AISummary of 3 articles

Artificial Analysis ranks Keenable Search 1.0 first and second on its Search Index, with pro scoring 83 and realtime 82, ahead of Exa and Perplexity at 80.

Both modes lead on DeepSearchQA at 88 F1 and cost about $0.040 per task at $4 per 1k searches, more than a third below the board median, the firm says.

Artificial Analysis also places Keenable's pro mode on the cost frontier of its Search Index vs. Cost per Task chart, meaning no product scores higher for less. Exa (lite, dynamic highlights) costs about the same and scores 79.

On speed, Keenable takes 15.0 seconds in realtime mode and 15.5 seconds in pro mode per task, second and third fastest behind Octen's 14.6 seconds, against a board median of about 28 seconds. Search accounts for only 2.3 and 3.0 seconds of that time, with the rest being model time.

Written by AI from the articles below · updated Nov 10, 11:52 AM ET

Check the sources:

Developments

3 developments

  1. Nov 10, 11:45 AM ET · 1 article
    Artificial Analysis reports Keenable search index speed results
    Artificial Analysis: Keenable search ranks second and third fastest on Artificial Analysis benchmark
  2. Nov 10, 11:45 AM ET · 1 article
    Artificial Analysis reports Keenable's search cost and index performance
    Artificial Analysis: Keenable ranks on the cost frontier in Artificial Analysis search benchmark
  3. Nov 10, 11:45 AM ET · 1 article
    Artificial Analysis ranks Keenable Search 1.0 first and second
    Artificial Analysis: Artificial Analysis ranks Keenable Search 1.0 first and second on search index

Article timeline

The articles in this story. Times are ET.

Nov 10
  1. Artificial AnalysisOfficial
    Keenable search ranks second and third fastest on Artificial Analysis benchmark

    AIArtificial Analysis reports that Keenable takes 15.0 seconds in realtime mode and 15.5 seconds in pro mode per search task, placing second and third fastest behind Octen's 14.6 seconds, against a board median of about 28 seconds. Search accounts for only 2.3 and 3.0 seconds of that time, with the remainder being model time. Artificial Analysis says both Keenable modes sit on the frontier of its Search Index vs. Time per Task chart, with no product scoring higher in less time.

    Image from @ArtificialAnlys's post
  2. Artificial AnalysisOfficial
    Keenable ranks on the cost frontier in Artificial Analysis search benchmark

    AIArtificial Analysis says Keenable (pro) sits on the cost frontier of its Search Index vs. Cost per Task chart, with no product scoring higher for less. Keenable costs about $0.040 per task, with search about $0.032 (8 searches at $4 per 1k) and the model about $0.008. Exa (lite, dynamic highlights) costs about the same and scores 79.

    Image from @ArtificialAnlys's post
  3. Artificial AnalysisOfficial
    Artificial Analysis ranks Keenable Search 1.0 first and second on search index

    AIArtificial Analysis ranks Keenable Search 1.0 first and second on its Search Index, with pro scoring 83 and realtime 82, ahead of Exa and Perplexity at 80. Both modes lead on DeepSearchQA at 88 F1 and cost about $0.040 per task at $4 per 1k searches, over a third below the board median. Realtime and pro return results in 15.0 and 15.5 seconds per task, placing second and third among the products measured.

    Image from @ArtificialAnlys's post

Heat Trend

Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.