Hamel Husain advises against ready-to-use AI evaluation metrics
Overview
Hamel Husain, an AI practitioner, says developers should generally not use ready-to-use evaluation metrics for AI evals, calling them a bad idea in most situations.
His reasoning appears in a linked blog post on his site.
He later published a 13-card pocket guide condensing his Applied AI Evals course, available at hamel.dev. The cards cover error analysis, when to write evals, and rejecting generic metrics. They recommend binary pass/fail scoring over Likert scales and describe three automated approaches: code assertions, LLM judges, and guardrails.
Written by AI from the articles below · updated Oct 11, 9:08 PM ET
Check the sources:
Developments
2 developments
- Oct 11, 8:47 PM ET · 1 articleHamel Husain condenses his AI evals course into a 13-card pocket guidemeng shao: Hamel Husain condenses his AI evals course into a 13-card pocket guide
- Oct 7, 11:00 AM ET · 1 articleQ: Should I use "ready-to-use" evaluation metrics? A: No. It's a bad idea in most situations. https://hamel.dev/blog/posts/evals-faq/should-i-use-ready-to-use-eHamel Husain: Hamel Husain argues against using ready-to-use evaluation metrics for AI
Article timeline
The articles in this story. Times are ET.
meng shao@shao__mengXHamel Husain condenses his AI evals course into a 13-card pocket guideAIHamel Husain compresses the key concepts of his Applied AI Evals course into a 13-card pocket guide, available at hamel.dev. The cards cover error analysis, when to write evals, rejecting generic metrics, and three types of automated evaluation: code assertions, LLM judges, and guardrails. The guide also recommends binary pass/fail scoring over Likert scales and deployment across CI/CD, online monitoring, and guardrails.

Hamel Husain@HamelHusainXHamel Husain argues against using ready-to-use evaluation metrics for AIAIHamel Husain answers "No" to whether teams should use ready-to-use evaluation metrics, calling them a bad idea in most situations. He points to a linked blog post for his reasoning.

Heat trend
Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.