Hugging Face's Lewis Tunstall reports 67% accuracy from grounded self-taught reasoning traces
Overview
Lewis Tunstall says his team dropped the teacher model and built training explanations from facts computed in code, plus the model's own estimate of how unusual a mutation looks.
He reports these grounded reasoning traces raised accuracy to about 67%, while the self-taught version stalled below 60%. The source is a single post on X, and the post gives no benchmark name or full method.
Written by AI from the articles below · updated Nov 2, 11:49 AM ET
Check the sources:
Article timeline
The articles in this story. Times are ET.
Lewis Tunstall@_lewtunXHugging Face reports 67% accuracy from code-grounded self-taught reasoning tracesAILewis Tunstall says his team built training explanations from facts computed in code plus the model's own sense of how unusual a mutation looks, without a teacher model. These grounded reasoning traces raised accuracy to about 67%, while the self-taught version stalled below 60%.

Heat Trend
Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.