Harvey reports context graphs raise legal agent accuracy on LAB tasks
Overview
Harvey reports that context graphs raised its legal agents' accuracy on LAB tasks, according to a post by Elvis Saravia that cites Harvey's report.
Firm Knowledge accuracy rose from 65% to 80%, precedent lists from 67% to 80%, and matter counting from 53% to 83%. Harvey also reports a 48% cost reduction for agents given a context graph.
Saravia says structured data works well for LLM-based agents, especially in complex codebases, and that context graphs may have broader uses. The figures are Harvey's own reported results, and the post does not include independent verification.
Written by AI from the articles below · updated Oct 15, 5:16 PM ET
Check the sources:
Article timeline
The articles in this story. Times are ET.
elvis@omarsar0XContext graphs lift Harvey's legal agent accuracy on LAB tasksAIElvis Saravia says structured data works well for LLM-based agents, especially in complex codebases, and that context graphs may have broader uses. He points to Harvey's report, where context graphs raised LAB task accuracy: Firm Knowledge rose from 65% to 80%, precedent lists from 67% to 80%, and matter counting from 53% to 83%. Harvey also reports a 48% cost reduction for agents given a context graph.
Heat trend
Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.