Skip to content
Trending storyDeveloping

Perplexity rolls out Gemini 4 Carbon to Pro and Max subscribers

2 articles2 sourcessince Nov 10Last article 2h ago ·

Overview

AISummary of 2 articles

Perplexity says Gemini 4 Carbon is available to Pro and Max subscribers in Perplexity Computer, where users can create persistent Teammates or run one-off agentic sessions.

A later Perplexity post says Carbon is also available in Search, but only for Max subscribers.

CEO Aravind Srinivas says Carbon costs 2.5x less than Claude Fable 5.2 with similar capabilities on agentic research tasks. His chart shows Carbon scoring 0.857 on the WANDR benchmark at $5.86 per task, against 0.851 and $14.51 for Claude Fable 5.2. These are Srinivas's figures, and the reports include no independent evaluation.

Written by AI from the articles below · updated Nov 10, 12:46 PM ET

Check the sources:

Article timeline

The articles in this story. Times are ET.

Nov 10
  1. PerplexityOfficial
    Perplexity makes Gemini 4 Carbon available in Computer and Search

    AIPerplexity says Gemini 4 Carbon is now available in Perplexity Computer for Pro and Max subscribers and in Search for Max subscribers. On its WANDR benchmark, the model scores 0.857 at $5.86 per task, matching Claude Fable 5.2 at 40% of the cost.

    WANDR score versus cost per task. Gemini 4 Carbon scores 0.857 at $5.86 per task, on the Pareto frontier. Claude Fable 5.2 scores 0.851 at $14.51 per task, and Gemini 4 Argon scores 0.802 at $7.88 per task.
  2. Aravind SrinivasOfficialPick
    Perplexity rolls out Gemini 4 Carbon to Pro and Max subscribers

    AIPerplexity says it is rolling out Gemini 4 Carbon to all Pro and Max subscribers. Users can create persistent Teammates with it or use it for one-off agentic sessions in Computer. Aravind Srinivas says Carbon costs 2.5x less than Claude Fable 5.2 with similar capabilities on agentic research tasks. The attached chart shows Gemini 4 Carbon scoring 0.857 on WANDR at $5.86 per task, against Claude Fable 5.2 at 0.851 and $14.51.

    Image from @AravSrinivas's post

Heat Trend

Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.