Meta's ProPerMem benchmark finds proactive assistants fail at deciding when to interrupt
Overview
Meta researchers introduce ProPerMem, a benchmark for memory-driven proactive assistants built from egocentric video and year-long personal memories averaging 618K tokens.
Every baseline scored at most 15%, even frontier models with retrieval-augmented memory.
The paper reports that GPT-5.3-Chat reached 96% when given oracle evidence in the window, but fell to 38% when choosing its own timing and to 15% when using retrieval. The authors say deciding when to interrupt, not just what to say, is where these assistants fail. Meta's ProPerAgent system, trained with reinforcement learning, reached 42.4% accuracy.
Written by AI from the articles below · updated Oct 20, 4:18 PM ET
Check the sources:
Article timeline
The articles in this story. Times are ET.
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_aiXMeta paper finds proactive assistants fail mainly on when to interruptAIMeta researchers introduce ProPerMem, a benchmark for memory-driven proactive assistants built from egocentric video and year-long personal memories averaging 618K tokens. Every baseline scored at most 15%, while GPT-5.3-Chat reached 96% with oracle evidence but only 38% when choosing its own timing. The paper's ProPerAgent system, trained with reinforcement learning, reached 42.4% accuracy.

Heat Trend
Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.