Skip to content
Trending storyDeveloping

BAAI and Renmin University publish SciResearchBench, a benchmark for AI literature search

4 articles1 sourcesince Oct 20Last article 1h ago ·

Overview

AISummary of 4 articles

BAAI and Renmin University of China say their paper introducing SciResearchBench has been accepted to NeurIPS 2026.

The benchmark tests AI agents on scientific literature discovery through two tasks: Deep Research, which asks an agent to find one target paper or confirm none exists, and Wide Research, which asks it to compile the full set of papers meeting strict conditions, averaging 9.23 valid papers per query.

BAAI says the benchmark contains 1,000 expert-curated computer science questions across eight areas, 600 Deep and 400 Wide, and that evidence is placed in methodology sections, tables, figure captions and appendices with key terms obscured so agents cannot rely on titles or abstracts. Reviewers rejected 75.9% of candidate questions during multi-round checks by PhD annotators, multi-model voting and adversarial tests. BAAI also says the dataset, evaluation suite and DeepXiv interactive environment are open-sourced, with the paper on arXiv (2604.25256).

Written by AI from the articles below · updated Oct 20, 10:06 AM ET

Check the sources:

Developments

2 developments

  1. Oct 20, 9:30 AM ET · 1 article
    BAAI and RUC paper SciResearchBench accepted to NeurIPS 2026
    BAAI: SciResearchBench benchmark for AI agents' scientific literature discovery accepted to NeurIPS 2026
  2. Oct 20, 9:30 AM ET · 3 articles
    BAAI introduces SciResearchBench for scientific literature discovery
    BAAI: BAAI releases SciResearchBench, an open benchmark for AI scientist agents

Article timeline

The articles in this story. Times are ET.

Oct 20
  1. BAAIOfficial
    SciResearchBench tests AI agents on 1,000 full-text computer science research questions

    AIBAAI introduces SciResearchBench, a benchmark of 1,000 expert-curated computer science instances spanning eight areas including CV, LLMs, Theory, and AI4Science. Its questions bury evidence in methodology details, tables, figure captions, and appendices, with surface terms obfuscated to block shortcuts from titles or abstracts. Candidates went through multi-round review by CS PhD annotators, multi-model consensus voting, and adversarial tests, with 75.9% rejected.

    Image from @BAAIBeijing's post
  2. BAAIOfficial
    BAAI releases SciResearchBench, an open benchmark for AI scientist agents

    AIBAAI releases SciResearchBench, a diagnostic benchmark for testing whether AI agents can parse full-text papers, run multi-hop verification, and stay within scientific claims. The dataset, evaluation suite, and DeepXiv interactive environment are open-sourced, with the paper linked on arXiv (2604.25256).

    Image from @BAAIBeijing's post
  3. BAAIOfficial
    SciResearchBench benchmark for AI agents' scientific literature discovery accepted to NeurIPS 2026

    AIBAAI and Renmin University of China say their joint paper introducing SciResearchBench has been accepted to NeurIPS 2026. The authors describe it as the first benchmark for systematically evaluating AI agents on complex, autonomous scientific literature discovery.

    Video from @BAAIBeijing's post
  4. BAAIOfficial
    BAAI releases SciResearchBench for scientific literature search evaluation

    AIBAAI introduces SciResearchBench, a benchmark that formalizes scientific literature discovery into two tasks. Deep Research requires finding one unique target paper through multi-step probing and full-text verification, or confirming that no qualifying paper exists. Wide Research requires compiling the complete set of papers meeting strict scientific conditions, averaging 9.23 valid papers per query.

    Image from @BAAIBeijing's post

Heat Trend

Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.