Sophia Yang shares a new model's agentic benchmark scores and pricing
Overview
Sophia Yang posts on X that a new model is out, sharing its benchmark results and pricing.
The reported figures show the model scoring 77.0 on DeepSWE, above Opus 5's 74.0, at about $0.20 per task versus about $12 for Opus 5. The model also beats Opus 5 on AutomationBench, Agents' Last Exam and Apex, but trails it on HLE, Terminal-Bench, ProgramBench, NL2Repo and the visual benchmarks.
The quoted thread describes a 552B-parameter mixture-of-experts model with a 1M context window, priced at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens at peak, half off-peak. These benchmark and price figures come from the quoted thread, not from independent testing.
Written by AI from the articles below · updated Oct 17, 8:55 AM ET
Check the sources:
Article timeline
The articles in this story. Times are ET.
Sophia Yang@sophiamyangXPickThis is the first model drop on a Saturday? Interesting choice 😄AIA new model reportedly scores 77.0 on DeepSWE, above the prior 74.2 and Opus 5's 74.0, at about $0.20 per task versus about $12 for Opus 5. It also beats Opus 5 on AutomationBench, Agents' Last Exam and Apex, but trails it on HLE, Terminal-Bench, ProgramBench, NL2Repo and the visual benchmarks. The quoted thread describes a 552B-parameter mixture-of-experts model with 196B Engram memory and a 1M context window, priced at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 output at peak.
Heat trend
- Current comparable heat
- 9
- Peak comparable heat
- 10Oct 17, 9:00 AM ET
- Change in past 24 hours
- –
The trend compares only continuously observed participants, so its scope may be smaller than the current heat total. Hover or tap for hourly heat; use arrow keys with a keyboard.