Stanford CS 329Z lecture argues filtering agent training data beats raw volume
Overview
Stanford's CS 329Z lecture 12 argues that filtering agent training data matters more than data volume, especially when data is scarce.
Meng Shao reposted the lecture on X on November 4, 2026. The lecture cites two examples. In SWE-bench Verified, 68.3% of tasks were filtered out. In LIMI, a model trained on 78 curated trajectories scored 73.5% on AgencyBench, compared with 47.8% for a model trained on 10,000 trajectories.
The figures come from the lecture as reposted by Shao. This report does not include independent verification of the benchmark results.
Written by AI from the articles below · updated Nov 4, 10:03 PM ET
Check the sources:
Article timeline
The articles in this story. Times are ET.
meng shao@shao__mengXStanford CS 329Z lecture 12 says filtering agent training data matters more than volumeAIMeng Shao reposts Stanford CS 329Z lecture 12 on data selection for agent training, arguing that filtering matters most when data is scarce. The lecture cites SWE-bench Verified, where 68.3% of tasks were filtered out, and LIMI, where 78 curated trajectories scored 73.5% on AgencyBench versus 47.8% for a model trained on 10,000.

Heat Trend
Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.