Skip to content
Trending storyDeveloping

Three Chinese OCR models compared: MiniCPM, Xiaomi, and Unlimited by use case

1 article1 sourcesince Oct 31Last article 2h ago ·

Overview

AISummary of 1 article

Meng Shao, writing on X, compares three recently released Chinese OCR models by use case: MiniCPM-OCR-1.0, Xiaomi-OCR-0, and Unlimited-OCR-2.

Shao reports that MiniCPM-OCR-1.0 leads on throughput at 1.217 pages per second and scores 92.39 on Wild. Xiaomi-OCR-0 scores highest on Real5 at 95.24 and includes built-in key information extraction and visual question answering. Unlimited-OCR-2 targets long documents, scoring 77.06 on MarathonDocBench.

Shao recommends choosing a model by scenario rather than comparing all three on one benchmark, because each model's scores come from different test sets.

Written by AI from the articles below · updated Oct 31, 10:51 AM ET

Check the sources:

Article timeline

The articles in this story. Times are ET.

Oct 31
  1. meng shaoX
    Three Chinese OCR models compared by use case: MiniCPM, Xiaomi, and Unlimited

    AIA comparison of three recently released Chinese OCR models: MiniCPM-OCR-1.0, Xiaomi-OCR-0, and Unlimited-OCR-2. MiniCPM-OCR-1.0 leads on throughput at 1.217 pages/s and Wild at 92.39, Xiaomi-OCR-0 scores highest on Real5 at 95.24 with built-in KIE and VQA, and Unlimited-OCR-2 targets long documents with MarathonDocBench at 77.06. The author recommends choosing by scenario rather than comparing all three on the same benchmark.

    Image from @shao__meng's post

Heat Trend

Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.