Skip to content
Trending storyDeveloping

Closed models refuse more at max reasoning effort, lowering evaluation accuracy

2 articles1 sourcesince Oct 14Last article 1h ago ·

Overview

AISummary of 2 articles

Lewis Tunstall (@_lewtun) reports that when evaluating closed models on refusal-triggering tasks such as cyber and bio, low reasoning effort produces fewer refusals and higher accuracy than max effort.

He says this yields test-time compute curves where max effort scores worse than low.

Tunstall asks how such results can be reported fairly.

Written by AI from the articles below · updated Oct 14, 8:26 AM ET

Check the sources:

Article timeline

The articles in this story. Times are ET.

Oct 14
  1. Lewis TunstallX
    Closed models refuse more at max reasoning effort, lowering accuracy

    AILewis Tunstall (@_lewtun) reports that when evaluating closed models on refusal-triggering tasks such as cyber and bio, low reasoning effort yields fewer refusals and higher accuracy than max effort. He notes this produces test-time compute curves where max effort performs worse than low, and asks how to fairly report such results.

    Image from @_lewtun's post
  2. Lewis TunstallX
    Closed models refuse more at max reasoning effort, skewing evaluations

    AILewis Tunstall says closed models on refusal-triggering tasks such as cyber and bio show few refusals and high accuracy at low reasoning effort, but many refusals and low accuracy at max effort. He notes this makes max effort score worse than low effort, and asks what the fairest way to report such performance is.

Heat trend

Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.