Skip to content
View original post on X: elvis
Published
38/100

Continual-ARC benchmark finds agent harnesses fail to learn, while training a 9B model succeeds

AIDaniel Lenton of Unify says OpenClaw, Hermes Agent and Prime Agent do not meaningfully learn from experience. On the new Continual-ARC benchmark, none of the three memorized anything of value or generalized to new tasks, while training a small 9B model's weights did both.
elvisVerified on X
@omarsar0
View on X

Highly recommended read.

This is a topic I have been researching and writing about recently.

The way we use agent memory in harnesses today works, but mostly for simple, one-off, and general tasks.

For more novel, complex, and domain-specific tasks, you will often find that current harness and memory systems don't generalize so well.

So the big question is: how can we encode continual learning capabilities in models and harnesses?

This is where the idea of co-evolving harnesses and models begins to make sense.

This work, along with the benchmark (Continual-ARC), provides an interesting analysis of this.

The harness is not just for steering the model and providing tools and context; it is increasingly becoming a key part of training pipelines to unlock continual learning in models. The harness continues to be important, but it can remain minimal and efficient.

Daniel Lenton@DanielLenton1
OpenClaw, Hermes Agent and Prime Agent don't meaningfully learn from experience. On Continual-ARC, our new benchmark at @letsunifyai, none of them were able to memorize anything of value and none were able to generalize to new tasks. Training a small 9B model's weights did both.
View quoted post on X
Source details

elvis · x.comPublished

Original title: Highly recommended read.