strongly disagree with the take that the “AI market is winner take all”. to begin with, if this were true, there wouldn’t be an anthropic. the only reason I could see it being winner takes all is if you plan on “pivotal acts” against all other efforts once you have the capability
roon disagrees that the AI market is winner-take-all
AIroon disagrees with the view that the AI market is winner-take-all, arguing that Anthropic's existence contradicts it. The only case where it would be winner-take-all, roon says, is if the leader planned "pivotal acts" against all other efforts once it had the capability.
Source details
roon · x.comPublished · added here
Original title: strongly disagree with the take that the “AI market is winner take all”. to begin with, if this were true, there wouldn’t be an anthropic...