The AI control gap: who decides when AI is safe enough to trust?
Original titleThe AI control gap: Who gets to say ‘It’s safe’?
AISummary
TheCUBE's analysis argues that independent oversight and enforceable authority, not company self-attestation, should decide when AI systems are safe for high-risk use.
The September 29 White House accord includes external assessment by company boards, but it creates no public authority with mandatory access or penalties, according to the piece.
Appian CEO Matt Calkins argues industries capable of causing large damage should be held responsible before harm occurs, not after civil penalties.
Source: SiliconANGLE · AI · siliconangle.comPublished · added here