Skip to content
View original post on X: Mattt
Published
52/100

Mattt's Swift API eval finds Sosumi lifts coding agent pass rates to about 98%

AIMattt says the sosumi.ai docs service served tens of millions of requests to coding agents in 30 days, from about 6,900 unique IPs per day. He built a 41-task Swift eval, mostly on new OS 27 SDK APIs, checked by the compiler and per-task rules.
MatttVerified on X
@mattt
View on X

Over the last 30 days, http://Sosumi.ai has served tens of millions of requests to coding agents looking up Apple docs, from about 6,900 (nice) unique IPs/day.

But does it actually help? I built an eval to find out: 41 Swift tasks, mostly new APIs in the OS 27 SDKs, checked by the compiler and per-task rules.

Without docs, Opus, GPT-6.1 Sol, and Sonnet pass about a third of them. With Sosumi, they pass 98%, 97%, and 94%.

Compared to built-in web search, Claude models score 12 to 30 points higher with Sosumi, at about half the cost or less. GPT does slightly better with web search (99%), but at 3× the cost.

Running the eval also turned up a handful of fixes, now live (one framework page was 3 MB 😬). The eval is open source: https://github.com/NSHipster/sosumi.ai/tree/main/evals/swift-api

Source details

Mattt · x.comPublished · added here

Original title: Over the last 30 days, http://Sosumi.ai has served tens of millions of requests to coding agents looking up Apple docs, from about 6,900 ...