Skip to content
View original post on X: h100envyX· 17/100AI score17/100

CrawlHive ships nine features in three days, including a public track record

AISummary

CrawlHive says it shipped nine features in three days, including JEV, a signal-scoring model that gives verdicts in 0.5 seconds for $0.00002 per token. Its public track record checks each verdict against the 24-hour price, and after tokens with linked wallets and fresh dev wallets rugged while rated CLEAN, the company capped such tokens at RISKY.

Post on XView on X
h100envyVerified on X
@h100envy

CRAWLHIVE + JEV + GROK BOTS: 9 FEATURES IN 3 DAYS. ONE F*CKING PERSON.

repo: https://github.com/h100envy/crawl-hive

three days ago crawlhive was a scanner with crawlers behind it

today it's a different product

every competitor says trust me. we shipped a page that shows every miss we made instead

9 major features. full breakdown of each with real numbers

jev decides if a signal is worth attention in 0.5 seconds for $0.00002
tokens that pumped scored 66–83%, the ones that dumped 49–55%, scam 3%
29 signals cost $0.0008 total

grok bot sits on duty over a crawler and calls LOOK / WATCH / AVOID
jev handles the confident ones, grok gets called only for the doubtful

chatgpt, claude, meta muse, cursor connect in one click via oauth
grok bot via mcp
the agent wakes up only when there's something new and doesn't burn credits for nothing

track record checks every verdict against the real price for 24 hours
the misses are visible on purpose

launch radar scans fresh launches on solana, bnb chain and robinhood chain every 3 minutes

a full app inside telegram: scan, radar, watchlist, crawlers in one bot
answers contract addresses right in groups
watches for rugs for 7 days
24 hours later it tells you itself whether the verdict came true

bnb chain and every solana launchpad including meteora

AI costs dropped 8–50x
ceiling of ~$1.25 a day no matter the traffic

security audit: several agents went through the whole codebase
every finding checked by hand
more than a dozen holes closed before anyone else found them

now the main part

3 hours after launch track record showed a pattern

tokens under a day old with linked wallets and a fresh dev wallet were passing as CLEAN and then rugging

SUKI with 12 linked wallets and a dev under an hour old passed as OK and rugged

we changed the rule the same day

now those tokens can't score above RISKY

that's the whole point of a public track record. it shows where the scanner is weak before the market does

no competitor does this. for them it's still on the roadmap

full breakdown in the article with screenshots and how each piece works inside

which scanner besides us shows you where it got it wrong?

CrawlHive@crawlhivexyz
https://x.com/i/article/2109956457785380865
View quoted post on X

Source: h100envy · x.comPublished · added here