Really appreciate this post. Yes AI is progressing very fast, but we still have the tools to describe what is happening without jumping to conclusions.
Nathan Lambert says AI progress needs description without jumping to conclusions
AINathan Lambert says he appreciates a post arguing that AI is progressing very fast but people still have the tools to describe what is happening without jumping to conclusions. The post is a reply to Dean W. Ball, who argues that rhetoric on recursive self-improvement is becoming more poorly calibrated and that more precise frameworks and terminology are needed.
Nathan LambertVerified on X
@natolambert
Recursive self-improvement is a critical issue, but the rhetoric on the subject is becoming more poorly calibrated over time. As we approach new stages of AI development—and RSI is one of them—we need more precise frameworks and terminology. I fear the opposite is happening.
Source details
Nathan Lambert · x.comPublished · added here
Original title: Really appreciate this post. Yes AI is progressing very fast, but we still have the tools to describe what is happening without jumping t...