Skip to content
View original post on X: Rohan Paul
Published
22/100

Claude Fable 5.2 costs more than GPT-6.1 Sol on a 3D voxel movie scene

AIAI/ML API compared Claude Fable 5.2 and GPT-6.1 Sol by building a 3D voxel scene from Cars' Piston Cup finale. Fable 5.2 cost $108.87 and GPT-6.1 Sol cost $13.02, and the post says Fable's higher cost reflects it placing every smoke puff as voxel geometry.
Rohan PaulVerified on X
@rohanpaul_ai
View on X

Interesting experiment by AI/ML API (@aimlapi).
Claude Fable 5.2 against GPT-6.1 Sol on building a 3D voxel movie scene.

Fable 5.2 spent $108.87 and GPT-6.1 Sol $13.02.

But that cost reflects that extra work: Fable 5.2 sticks to voxels. A strict voxel style means every puff of smoke is geometry the model has to place, and Fable did it in every shot.

Also, in the crash shot, Fable’s flipping car is lit and its paint scheme is readable. Sol’s car is a dark silhouette in the same shot.

you can try Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 Sol on aimlapi[.]com

https://x.com/aimlapi/status/2119889097053409682/video/1

AI/ML API@aimlapi
Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 Sol at Cars movie 🏁 Fable 5.2 re-created the Cars Piston Cup finale in 3D voxels for $108.87 while GPT-6.1 Sol's version cost $13.02 Run both models via API -> https://aimlapi.com
View quoted post on X
Source details

Rohan Paul · x.comPublished · added here

Original title: Interesting experiment by AI/ML API (@aimlapi).

Topics

AI codingExpert opinion