Even little Haiku found about twice as many major errors as human reviewers.
Post by Andrew Curran on X
Andrew CurranVerified on X
@AndrewCurran_
Lots of debate this week on whether journals should ban AI in peer review. We actually tested this in our new preprint, and the results were pretty clear to me. For context, I've reviewed for most of the big journals and evaluated 1,000 human reviews as an editor. I love to read and evaluate science. TLDR: From now on I won't do any peer review without AI. For clinical trials, I'd even call human-only review dangerous 🧵
Source details
Andrew Curran · x.comPublished · added here