Skip to content
View original post on X: swyx 🗽 @aiDotEngineer NYCX· 5/100AI score5/100

Swyx says missing counterexamples while reading feedslop means lost independent thought

AISummary

swyx (@swyx) argues that readers who do not immediately think of counterexamples to a post are not exercising free will or independent thought. The post is a reply-style note on feed content, and it cites @bpodgursky's remark that labs crack esoteric math problems rather than ones giving commercial advantage.

Post on XView on X

if you didnt immediately think of counterexamples you are not exercising your own free will and independent thought while reading feedslop

Ben Podgursky@bpodgursky
Lucky coincidence the labs are only successfully cracking esoteric math problems and not the problems where a solution would give the winner an asymmetric commerical advantage.
View quoted post on X

Source: swyx 🗽 @aiDotEngineer NYC · x.comPublished · added here