Skip to content
View original post on X: Artificial AnalysisOfficial
Published
40/100

Artificial Analysis finds higher Claude tiers beat max effort on cost per task

AIArtificial Analysis says Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh, 57) outscores Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max, 55) with 40% lower cost per task and about half the time per task. Claude Fable 5.2 (high) also beats Opus 5.5 (max), and Fable 5.2 (low) beats Opus 5.5 (high).
Artificial AnalysisVerified on XOfficial
@ArtificialAnlys
View on X

With the current Claude lineup, moving up a model tier beats maxing out effort to achieve the highest intelligence per dollar

At nearly every Cost per Task, we see the largest model sits on the performance vs. cost Pareto frontier for @AnthropicAI models:

➤ Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh, 57) outscores Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max, 55) with 40% lower Cost per Task and about half the Time per Task
➤ Claude Fable 5.2 (high) beats Opus 5.5 (max), with smaller cost and time savings, and Fable 5.2 (low) beats Opus 5.5 (high)
➤ This pattern doesn’t hold at the cheapest tier, where every step up from Claude Haiku 5.5 (max) costs more

Source details

Artificial Analysis · x.comPublished · added here

Original title: With the current Claude lineup, moving up a model tier beats maxing out effort to achieve the highest intelligence per dollar