# Essay weighs "creating vs creativity" in AI-generated art

> Original title: Let’s talk about AI. Let’s talk about art. Let’s talk about generative AI in art.

- Source: X search: indie AI launches (I built, solo founder)
- Published: 2026-10-29T19:15:28.000Z
- Bad Influence: https://badinfluence.news/items/tggjn6t4qd8wit1xffjudmxmw
- Original: https://x.com/TheSonoran_/status/2115885244847137162

## Summary

An X article by a solo designer argues that AI can create images but cannot supply creativity, which the author defines as intent and taste. It contends that AI works as a medium, so the human intent behind a piece still matters, while acknowledging that artists did not consent to their work being used as training data.

## Post

Let’s talk about AI. Let’s talk about art. Let’s talk about generative AI in art.

My thoughts on the discourse around @Vengenz1's words, and why I think “creating vs creativity” is the only part of the thread that really matters. https://x.com/i/article/2115880113099448320