# Gergely Orosz says SaaS vendors must prove security or in-house tools win

> Original title: This assumes SaaS vendors that can prove they are super secure.

- Source: Gergely Orosz
- Published: 2026-11-04T03:08:20.000Z
- Bad Influence: https://badinfluence.news/items/otbcn2tfu7267s6l2lxw8gri7
- Original: https://x.com/GergelyOrosz/status/2117816186318590205

## Summary

Gergely Orosz argues that in-house software is as good as SaaS, since it removes one attack surface, unless SaaS vendors can prove they are secure. He says he has not seen any SaaS vendor attempt to do so, and asks whether vendors will step up.

## Post

This assumes SaaS vendors that can prove they are super secure.

Not seeing any SaaS even attempt this. Until they do, in-house is just as good: one less attack surface vs a vendor that could be popped

(Time for SaaS vendors to step up?)

## Quoted post @scottbelsky

> narrative violation: preferences will swing back from DIY vibe-coded software to super secure industry-leading SaaS solutions. 
> 
> while it's super easy to build anything, endlessly protecting and securing it is super hard...and teams want to sleep at night.

https://x.com/scottbelsky/status/2117694229770371254