Anthropic has released Claude Haiku 5.5, priced at one tenth of the previous Haiku 4.5 and one twentieth of Sonnet 5.5. The source excerpt is cut off before listing the full comparison, so the comparison with OpenAI's pricing is not confirmed here.
Anthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, which the article says outperforms DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GLM-5.3-Flash on official benchmarks and matches GPT-6 Luna on price. On OSWorld 2.1, its Low effort tier scores 42.0% at $0.07 per task, versus 15.7% at $1.45 for Haiku 4.5 at Max. Migrating from Haiku 4.5 requires changes to thinking configuration, sampling parameters, assistant prefill, and the computer-use tool version.
Anthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, a small model priced at about a quarter of Haiku 4.5's running cost. Anthropic also halved Sonnet 5.5 cache read prices from 20 cents to 10 cents per million tokens.
ICYMI we've cut the price of Sonnet 5.5 cache reads in half. In the Claude Platform, it's now $0.10 per million tokens (input is $2, output is $10). This means Sonnet 5.5 now runs ~20% cheaper on most agentic work. (API only, no change to Claude Code usage limits.)
Claude Haiku 5.5 (1587 pts) is a +257pt improvement over Haiku 4.5 (1330 pts)! It also significantly improved across all categories. Dive into the Code Arena: WebDev at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev
Models are getting a lot more aligned, quickly!
Anthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, raising its OSWorld 2.1 score from 15.7% to 72.4% and supporting a 1 million token context window. The article notes Haiku 5.5 still scores 39.2% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against Sonnet 5.5's 70.6%, and that prompts above 100,000 tokens are priced higher, so migration costs need to be measured on real workloads.
Anthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, its fastest and most affordable small model, at prices up to 90 percent lower for most prompts under 100,000 tokens. Artificial Analysis ranks it first among small-class models on its Intelligence Index with a score of 43, but it consumes about three times the output tokens per task that GPT-6 Luna needs at maximum effort.
Anthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, priced the same as OpenAI's GPT-6 Luna, with a 1M-token context window. Artificial Analysis scored it 43 on its Intelligence Index, slightly ahead of GPT-6 Luna at 38, but it uses about 3x more output tokens at max effort.
Anthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, which it calls the fastest, cheapest, and most capable Haiku model so far. On average it costs about 75% less to run than Haiku 4.5, with input at $0.10 and output at $0.50 per million tokens for requests up to 100,000 tokens. Anthropic also cut Sonnet 5.5's cache read price from $0.20 to $0.10 per million tokens, which it says lowers run costs by about 20% on many agent tasks.
Read more at https://devin.ai/blog/claude-haiku-5-5
Anthropic has released Claude Haiku 5.5, priced at $0.10 input and $0.50 output per million tokens up to 100,000 tokens, matching GPT-6 Luna. Beyond 100,000 tokens the price rises to $0.50 and $2.50, and the author found the new tokenizer uses about 1.25x as many tokens as Haiku 4.5 on the same long prompt. The model cannot disable reasoning and defaults to medium effort.
Anthropic has released Claude Haiku 5.5, its cheapest and fastest small model, priced at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens for prompts up to 100K tokens. It keeps a 1M token context window, up to 128K output tokens, and is generally available on the Claude API, Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud, Microsoft Foundry and Claude Platform on AWS. Anthropic reports 72.4% on OSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) versus 15.7% for Haiku 4.5, and the article notes that non-default temperature, top_p or top_k values return a 400 error.
For reference, Haiku 4.5 came out on October 15th, 2025 so these two columns are less than a year apart. and oh yeah Haiku 5.5 is also much faster and 75% cheaper...
Haiku 5.5 is a good Haiku. With 100k token context, it's also 10x cheaper than Haiku 4.5
Anthropic's Claude Haiku 5.5 is now available on Amazon Bedrock and Claude Platform on AWS. According to Anthropic, it is the fastest and most efficient model in the Claude 5.5 family and costs around 75 percent less than Claude Haiku 4.5 for most tasks. The post also covers pairing it with Claude Opus 5.5 as a subagent layer and provides Boto3, Converse, and Anthropic SDK examples for calling the model.
Anthropic has released Claude Haiku 5.5, a small, fast model for high-volume, cost-sensitive tasks such as summarization, subagents, and browser use. It succeeds Claude Haiku 4.5 with stronger coding and computer use capabilities.
Anthropic has released Claude Haiku 5.5, a small, fast model for high-volume, cost-sensitive tasks such as summarization, subagents, and browser use. It succeeds Claude Haiku 4.5 with stronger coding and computer use capabilities.
Anthropic has released Claude Haiku 5.5, which it describes as the cheapest, fastest, and most capable small model it has released. On average it costs around 75% less to run than Claude Haiku 4.5, and the author says it is 10x cheaper than Haiku 4.5 under 100k tokens. It can be tried with computer use, workflows, and the API.
This story has a top pick“Anthropic releases Claude Haiku 5.5, scoring 43 on the Intelligence Index”
Anthropic has released Claude Haiku 5.5, which the author describes as its fastest and cheapest model to date. The source says it costs about 75% less to run than Claude Haiku 4.5 and is the first Haiku model with an adjustable effort setting. The attached benchmark table reports Haiku 5.5 scores on tasks including computer use (OSWorld 2.1 offline subset, 72.4%) and Terminal-Bench 4.0 (39.2%), compared with Haiku 4.5 and other models.
Learn more: https://www.anthropic.com/claude-haiku-5-5
For prompts under 100K tokens, it's $0.10 / $0.50 per million tokens with cache reads at $0.01. Above 100K tokens, $0.50 / $2.50 per million, with cache reads at $0.05.
Haiku 5.5 is now available in the Claude Platform and Claude Code. On average, it costs around 75% less to run than Haiku 4.5. It pairs well with Opus 5.5 or Sonnet 5.5 as a subagent. Use it for high-volume, cost-sensitive tasks like summaries, compactions, or database queries.
Another model joins the 5.5 family with the small but mighty Haiku 5.5! It’s built for speed and efficiency, and costs 75% less than Haiku 4.5. Opus does the heavy thinking, Haiku does the high-volume work, and together you get more done for less. Happy shipping!
Anthropic has introduced Claude Haiku 5.5, which it describes as the cheapest, fastest, and most capable small model it has released. On average, running it costs around 75% less than Claude Haiku 4.5. The author's own post only announces availability and offers no further detail.
Anthropic has introduced Claude Haiku 5.5, which it calls the cheapest, fastest, and most capable small model it has released. On average, running it costs around 75% less than Claude Haiku 4.5.
Haiku 5.5 is available now on all platforms, including Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure. Read more: https://www.anthropic.com/claude-haiku-5-5
Haiku 5.5 is especially good value on tasks under 100,000 tokens, which make up around 90% of requests to our previous Haiku model.
Haiku 5.5 shows major improvements across almost all of our alignment evaluations relative to Haiku 4.5, with far fewer instances of misaligned behavior.
Haiku 5.5 is designed for high-volume, cost-sensitive tasks. It reliably handles repetitive work like summaries and classification, and pairs well with Claude Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5 as a subagent on coding work. It’s also fast enough for live customer support and browser use.
Haiku 5.5 is a significant step up over Haiku 4.5 across coding, computer use, and knowledge work.
Anthropic introduces Claude Haiku 5.5, which it describes as the cheapest, fastest, and most capable small model it has released. On average, running it costs around 75% less than Claude Haiku 4.5.
Anthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, which it calls its cheapest, fastest, and most capable small model. It costs around 75% less to run than Haiku 4.5 and is aimed at high-volume, cost-sensitive tasks such as summaries and classification. The release also cuts Sonnet 5.5 cache read prices by 50%, and the model is available on AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure.
Anthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, which scores 43 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, up 26 points from the last Haiku release. Pricing is $0.10/$0.50 per 1M input/output tokens up to 100k tokens, rising to $0.50/$2.50 above that, but at max effort it uses about 162k output tokens per Intelligence Index task, roughly 3x GPT-6 Luna.
AIWhy it matters: The benchmark shows Haiku 5.5 scores well but uses far more output tokens than GPT-6 Luna, so cost per task matters beyond list price.
Anthropic launched Claude Haiku 5.5, which it describes as the cheapest, fastest, and most capable small model it has released, aimed at high-volume, cost-sensitive tasks. Max and Team plans now include monthly API credits for running their own apps and agents on the Claude Platform, rolling out over a few days. Users claim the credits by linking a Claude Console organization in Settings > Billing for Max or Organization settings > Billing for Team.
AIWhy it matters: The notes name a new small model and a credit change for Max and Team plans, with the claim path, which matters for teams budgeting API use.
Liquid AI released d1 with vision support, accepting images, text, or both as inputs. In tests on six real applications, d1 matched or beat GPT-6.1 Sol on four while costing 19x to 200x less than both GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Opus 5.5. It returns probabilities for yes/no, choice, or score questions in one forward pass, with text decisions in 200 to 300 ms.
Artificial Analysis reports that Google's Gemini 4 Argon scores 53 on its Intelligence Index with high reasoning, matching GPT-6 Astra (max) and one point ahead of GPT-6.1 Sol (max). At the current 50% launch discount, its cost per task is $1.99, about 60% of GPT-6 Astra's $3.26, but the discount's end date is unconfirmed and standard pricing would raise it to $3.98. The model is being rolled out to selected users and is not publicly available.
AIWhy it matters: The benchmark compares Gemini 4 Argon's cost per task and hallucination rate with GPT-6 Astra, showing where its value depends on a temporary 50% discount.
Anthropic has released Claude Sonnet 5.5, the second model in the Claude 5.5 family. The company says it is more than 30% faster than Sonnet 5 and costs up to 30% less for most work.
AIWhy it matters: The post gives concrete speed and price changes against Sonnet 5, which helps readers judge whether the upgrade fits their workloads and budgets.
And...Haiku 5.5 will round out the family in the coming weeks.
Anthropic's Cat Wu says Claude Sonnet 5.5 lets Claude Code users complete about 30% more tasks than with Sonnet 5. The model needs fewer tokens for the same work, and in a leaf-raking tool-call demo it finished 24 seconds faster using 6K fewer tokens.
AIWhy it matters: The post gives a measured Claude Code task-completion gain and a token-use example, showing what the model upgrade means for a coding agent workflow.